CIN vs ICO
A detailed comparison of Kodak Cineon and ICO Icon — file size, quality, compatibility, and which format to choose for your workflow.
Kodak Cineon
Raster & Vector ImagesCineon is a digital film format developed by Kodak for scanning and recording motion picture film. It uses logarithmic encoding to capture the full density range of film negative, preserving maximum tonal detail for post-production grading.
About CIN filesICO Icon
Raster & Vector ImagesICO is the icon file format used for favicons and Windows application icons. A single ICO file can contain multiple image sizes and color depths for different display contexts.
About ICO filesStrengths Comparison
CIN Strengths
- 10-bit log color preservation.
- Film-scanning archival standard.
- DPX-compatible.
ICO Strengths
- Multi-resolution: one file, many sizes, OS picks the right one.
- Universal favicon support in every browser since IE5.
- Supports transparency (1-bit since 1985, full alpha since XP).
- Tiny file size — an entire favicon pack typically fits in under 15 KB.
- No licensing or patent concerns — fully in the public domain spec-wise.
Limitations
CIN Limitations
- Legacy — DPX is the modern choice.
- No compression.
- Niche tooling.
ICO Limitations
- Cannot compress continuous-tone images efficiently — use PNG or WebP for photos.
- Format is essentially frozen in 1999 — no HDR, no wide gamut, no modern features.
- Maximum image dimension is 256×256 px (inside an ICO container).
- Editing requires specialized tools — most image editors treat it as a curiosity.
Technical Specifications
| Specification | CIN | ICO |
|---|---|---|
| MIME type | image/cineon | image/vnd.microsoft.icon |
| Extension | .cin | — |
| Encoding | 10-bit logarithmic per channel | — |
| Successor | SMPTE 268M DPX | — |
| Max resolutions per file | — | 65 535 images |
| Max single image size | — | 256×256 px |
| Color depths | — | 1, 4, 8, 24, 32 bits per pixel |
| Compression | — | Uncompressed bitmap or embedded PNG (Vista+) |
Typical File Sizes
CIN
- 2K scanned 35mm frame ~12 MB
- 4K scan ~50 MB
ICO
- Classic favicon (16×16 only) < 2 KB
- Multi-size favicon pack (16/32/48/256) 5-15 KB
- Full Windows app icon set 20-100 KB
Ready to convert?
Convert between CIN and ICO online, free, and without installing anything. Encrypted upload, automatic deletion after 2 hours.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIN (Kodak Cineon) is an image format used to store raster graphics — a two-dimensional grid of pixels describing a picture. It is part of the raster & vector images family and designed around a specific trade-off between file size, visual fidelity, and feature support (transparency, colour depth, compression type). Photographers, web designers, and content creators choose CIN when its particular strengths match the publishing target.
ICO (Icon) is Microsoft's 1985 multi-resolution icon format, originally shipped with Windows 1.0. A single .ico file holds multiple sizes (16×16, 32×32, 48×48, 256×256) so the OS can pick the best one for the current display context. Since 1999, every website uses a favicon.ico to show its icon in browser tabs.
Most desktop photo viewers (Windows Photos, macOS Preview, GIMP, Photoshop, Affinity Photo) open CIN natively. On mobile, iOS Photos and Google Photos display CIN in the gallery when supported by the OS. If the format is rare or new, convert to JPG or PNG first — both are universally readable — using our CIN to JPG or CIN to PNG converter.
On Windows, ICO files open natively in File Explorer and Photos. On macOS, Preview handles basic display. For editing, use GIMP (free), Photoshop with a plugin, or dedicated icon editors like IcoFX.
Upload the CIN to KaijuConverter and pick a target format (JPG, PNG, WebP, HEIC, TIFF, BMP, SVG, PDF). The conversion runs in the browser via ImageMagick and returns a download in seconds. No account or installation required; both input and output delete automatically within two hours.
It depends on the task. JPG is the smallest file size for photographs; PNG is lossless with transparency; CIN has its own niche that may favour colour depth, animation, or encoding efficiency over one or both of those. For the final web publish, test all three and measure file size plus visible quality on real content.