CONVERT
TEXTILE → MEDIAWIKI
Tap to choose your fileDRAG. DROP. DONE.
Upload any file and our engines will handle format detection automatically.
Max 25 MB · Free plan · No signup required
Convert to:
Detecting available formats...
Optimize for
Leave empty to use original name. Extension added automatically.
Uploading...
Processing your file...
Fast, secure TEXTILE to MEDIAWIKI conversion. No registration required.
Situation. TEXTILE is a document format oriented around a particular office suite or publishing pipeline. Solution: a MEDIAWIKI, produced below. A TEXTILE to MEDIAWIKI job turns one office document into another without retyping anything. Styles, pagination and embedded content cross the bridge cleanly because we use the same engine that powers professional document pipelines. Upload a TEXTILE file above, adjust any Advanced options, and download a ready-to-use MEDIAWIKI. Context: TEXTILE is a document format oriented around a particular office suite or publishing pipeline. MEDIAWIKI is a document format oriented around a particular office suite or publishing pipeline.
Textile Markup
Source formatTextile is a lightweight markup language that generates HTML from a human-readable syntax. It was popularized by the Textpattern CMS and the Redmine project management tool, offering a cleaner writing experience than raw HTML.
MediaWiki Markup
Target formatMediaWiki markup is the wikitext syntax used by Wikipedia and thousands of MediaWiki-powered wikis. It provides formatting for links, tables, templates, categories, and references, powering one of the largest collaborative content systems.
Why convert TEXTILE to MEDIAWIKI
Opening TEXTILE in the tool that natively reads MEDIAWIKI is rarely clean. Converting upstream rebuilds the document in the target format so headings become headings, lists stay lists, and the receiving tool does not flag layout warnings.
HOW TO CONVERT
TEXTILE → MEDIAWIKI
Drop the TEXTILE file
Upload your document — or a ZIP of several documents for batch conversion — through the web form.
Convert through pandoc
Our pandoc-based pipeline opens the TEXTILE, preserves structure and typography, and writes the MEDIAWIKI.
Retrieve the document
Click the download button; the MEDIAWIKI is delivered as a single file (or ZIP of files for batch jobs).
Common Use Cases
Share across platforms
Send MEDIAWIKI files to anyone without worrying about whether they have the right software for TEXTILE.
Embed in documents
Drop MEDIAWIKI output into Word, Google Docs, PowerPoint, Notion or a website without conversion warnings.
Optimize size
MEDIAWIKI often produces smaller files than TEXTILE for web, email and storage.
Archive & future-proof
Store in a widely-supported format that will still open on future operating systems without legacy plugins.
TEXTILE vs MEDIAWIKI — Strengths and limitations
What each format does best, and where it falls short.
TEXTILE Strengths
- More expressive than Markdown in classical usage (tables, footnotes, classes).
- Mature implementation in RedCloth (Ruby), php-textile, js-textile.
- Core format of Redmine — millions of daily users.
- Clean human-readable syntax.
Limitations
- Market share decimated by Markdown since the mid-2000s.
- Not as widely supported outside the Ruby/Rails ecosystem.
- No CommonMark-style spec — implementations differ on edge cases.
MEDIAWIKI Strengths
- Powers Wikipedia — battle-tested at planet scale.
- Templates enable reusable content blocks.
- Internal links, categories, and interwiki references work out of the box.
- Huge existing tooling and translation ecosystem.
Limitations
- Parsing is notoriously hard — context-sensitive by design.
- Authoring requires learning the unique syntax.
- Lacks standardization — no formal spec, just the MediaWiki implementation.
TEXTILE vs MEDIAWIKI — Technical specifications
Side-by-side comparison of the technical details.
TEXTILE
- MIME type
- text/x-textile
- Extensions
- .textile
- Implementations
- RedCloth (Ruby), php-textile, js-textile
- Primary users
- Redmine, Textpattern, early Rails
- Encoding
- UTF-8
MEDIAWIKI
- MIME type
- text/x-wiki
- Extensions
- .mediawiki, .wiki
- Encoding
- UTF-8
- Parser
- MediaWiki core + Parsoid (HTML)
- Canonical user
- Wikipedia + Wikimedia sister projects
| Specification | TEXTILE | MEDIAWIKI |
|---|---|---|
| MIME type | text/x-textile | text/x-wiki |
| Extensions | .textile | .mediawiki, .wiki |
| Implementations | RedCloth (Ruby), php-textile, js-textile | — |
| Primary users | Redmine, Textpattern, early Rails | — |
| Encoding | UTF-8 | UTF-8 |
| Parser | — | MediaWiki core + Parsoid (HTML) |
| Canonical user | — | Wikipedia + Wikimedia sister projects |
TEXTILE vs MEDIAWIKI — Typical file sizes
Approximate file sizes for common scenarios.
TEXTILE
- Blog post 3-30 KB
- Redmine wiki page 5-50 KB
MEDIAWIKI
- Short Wikipedia article source 5-30 KB
- Long Wikipedia article with templates 50-300 KB
- Full Wikipedia XML dump ~20 GB compressed
Quality & Compatibility
Headings, paragraphs, lists, tables, hyperlinks and inline images all survive the conversion with their semantic structure intact. Rare features unique to TEXTILE — legacy macros, form fields, obscure frame styles — are flattened to static content where no direct MEDIAWIKI equivalent exists. Tracked changes, where both formats support them, transfer cleanly.
Tips for Best Results
- Round-tripping between TEXTILE and MEDIAWIKI (converting back and forth) can accumulate small formatting drift — do one conversion and stay in that format.
- If the TEXTILE has tracked changes, accept or reject them before converting to avoid surprises in the MEDIAWIKI output.
- Very long documents split cleanly at existing section breaks; add section breaks deliberately if you need precise page boundaries.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, as long as the fonts are standard (system fonts or common office fonts like Arial, Calibri, Times, Helvetica). Custom corporate fonts survive if they are embedded in the source document; otherwise the conversion substitutes the closest available match, which can shift line breaks by a character or two.
Yes. Inline images are embedded into the MEDIAWIKI at full resolution, editable tables become native MEDIAWIKI tables, and hyperlinks keep their URLs. Complex features unique to TEXTILE — macros, form fields, track-changes — are mapped where an equivalent exists in MEDIAWIKI and flattened into static content otherwise.
All uploads go over TLS, files are processed in isolated containers and both the source and the output are deleted within two hours. No account is required, file contents are never indexed or used for training, and the paid plan adds a signable data-processing agreement for regulated workflows.
RELATED CONVERSIONS
Other popular pairs involving TEXTILE or MEDIAWIKI
More from TEXTILE
More ways to reach MEDIAWIKI
Related comparisons
See these formats side by side to understand which fits your use case best.
Secure & Private Conversion
Your files are encrypted during transfer, processed in isolated containers, and automatically deleted within 60 minutes. We never read, share, or store your data.